<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments on Revision of History</title>
    <link>http://historyonair.mypublicsquare.com/view/revision-of-history</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>An editorial about revisions of history.</description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the constant froth and backwash of written word we Americans find ourselves immersed in, it is refreshing, even reinvigorating, to hear some basic sensibility about&lt;br /&gt;how to read.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Especially today, authorship is uncertain. Reputations and motivations of public writers are often dubious at best.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;The essense of this article should be the bedrock foundation of &lt;span class="caps"&gt;ALL&lt;/span&gt; our reading.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://historyonair.mypublicsquare.com/view/revision-of-history#content_16191</link>
      <guid>http://historyonair.mypublicsquare.com/view/revision-of-history#content_16191</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 20:12:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Gary Johnson</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
